Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Zager's avatar

Thank goodness you’ve revived Insight. I’ve missed it.

When I read each of those articles, I felt relief that your systemic perspective was once again publicly present, and that your sanity could again help sift the wheat from the chaff.

In both cases I found it hard to read user comments because so many missed the point and went immediately to the emotional impact of the topic rather than to your line of reasoning. It was as if you hadn’t said, We’ve got to prevent this before it’s a pandemic, but rather, Another pandemic is coming, get ready! Or that rather than your casting light on the mechanisms by which the British royalty manipulate the tabloids as part of spreading their obnoxious views behind the scenes, you were castigating those whose honor must be upheld at all costs.

I react both with disparagement that it’s (as usual) the myth of Sisyphus come real; and with gratitude that you have the vision, clarity of presentation, and persistence to continue.

Expand full comment
tkpwaeub's avatar

Something I'd really like to see for general pandemic preparedness.

Let's talk about insurance. That's how we prepare, financially, for losses we wouldn't otherwise be able to deal with: fires, car crashes, property damage, illnesses, etc.

When insurance companies get slammed with lots of claims, all at once, they turn to big reinsurance companies like Lloyd's, Swiss Re, Munich Re, etc. Unfortunately those contracts can get kind of messy, and the actual amount of a large loss can be difficult to measure (adjust) so someone came up with the idea of parametric insurance. With that, instead of attempting to determine the actual loss, you link the contract to some sort of index: crop yields, heating/cooling degree days, distance from an earthquake of a certain magnitude, etc.

It occurs to me that wastewater surveillance would be a good fit for such instruments. Not sure how much more it needs to mature to get the attention of reinsurers, but....surely only a matter of time. And someone with a NYT column, perhaps.

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts