Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Can's avatar

This is somewhat tangential, but I have a broader version of the usual "But what about Long COVID?" question, partially inspired by the likelihood of many more breakthroughs likely to stem from Omicron.

I'm curious if you have a sense of why the topic is often not addressed when talking about headline COVID risks - both in the popular media and often among experts. There's obviously plenty of mentions and articles about it, but I would say the (vast) majority don't mention it or mention it as an afterthought.

I personally don't have a great answer, but my intuitive sense is that it likely means that the more serious cases aren't as common as some estimates have suggested. I.e. if longterm strong versions of Long COVID (e.g. severe chronic fatigue & brainfog) were quite common (say in 10% or even 30% of cases) then we would be hearing about it MUCH more from many corners and with increased urgency.

An alternative explanation could be that the lack of good data makes it hard to write a good story about it but I'm not fully convinced by that one.

Expand full comment
Florin's avatar

Disposable N95 respirators aren't that great; they generally provide a poor fit and that makes them prone to leaks. If everyone wore the things, this leakiness wouldn't be a problem, since they'd still prevent aerosols from accumulating indoors despite leaks. Unfortunately, most people aren't going to wear them (thanks to the CDC/WHO/most public health officials).

Fortunately, way better PPE exists in the form of elastomeric respirators. Elastomerics offer better fit, filtering (N100 filters), and comfort than N95s. They last forever too. Their only disadvantage is that they muffle speech somewhat.

https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/584008

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK540078/#effi1

https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.05.022

https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2008.894

Expand full comment
25 more comments...

No posts